Fire Resistance
How can the most modern society in the world today have such dismal fire-death statistics? The answer is because all too often we do not utilize building designs that take advantage of fire detection (alarms), fire suppression (sprinklers) and fire containment (non-combustible fire walls). Alarms and sprinklers are effective but they do not always work. When they don't work as expected, then fire damage is extensive and deadly because, for economical considerations, fire containment is not part of the fire-protection plan.
Life-safety is paramount but so is property preservation. The costs attributed to fires that are protected only by sprinklers are disastrous. Water damage can be as extensive as fire damage. The smart design is one that considers the complete protection of both fire suppression and fire containment. When you contain the fire to the area of origin, everyone and everything else is fully protected.
Witelite by Tarmac has the highest fire ratings of any other lightweight aggregate. Masonry walls are fire tested using the American Society of Testing Materials (ASTM) test procedure E-119. Recent tests by Underwriters Laboratories have shown that Witelite by Tarmac can be blended with sand up to 50% by volume and still maintain fire ratings. The blending of aggregates allows economy and a choice of textures.
Fire Rated Concrete Masonry Units
1. The equivalent thickness of the CMU. The only valid procedure to establish the equivalent thickness of a CMU is by using test procedure ASTM C-140 (Standard Test Methods of Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units). Every block manufacturer should have test results showing the equivalent thickness of each unit they supply.
ACI 216.1 (Standard Method for Determining Fire Ratings of Concrete and Masonry Assemblies), has been adopted by the new International Building Code (IBC) that will go into effect in early 2000 A.D. Chapter 3 of ACI 216.1 provides a chart (see Pages 2.5 and 2.6) identifying the types of aggregates used to manufacture CMU's and the fire ratings for each of the aggregates. The blending of aggregates is acceptable (and common), however, the fire ratings will need to be established using the calculation method.
EXAMPLE AND CAUTIONS:
Example: An 8"x8"x16" CMU is used in a construction project and the specifications require a two hour fire rating for the block. The manufacturer should be required to submit a test report establishing the equivalent thickness of the 8 inch unit being supplied. Most 8"x8"x16" CMU's will have an equivalent thickness of 3.8 inches to 4.0 inches.
Cautions:
an 8 inch CMU will not meet a two hour requirement unless the equivalent thickness is
4.2 inches or greater.
Listed below is a suggested specification language designed to put the responsibility to accurately comply with fire rating requirements on the block manufacturer. It is an example of a section that can be added to a firm's standard specifications to assure compliance with required fire ratings. The section numbers may vary according to each firm's numbering format.
04200 UNIT MASONRY
04204 Fire Rated Concrete Masonry Units
4.01 Fire ratings for concrete masonry units will be considered being in compliance when:
4.01.1 The CMU has been certified through ASTM E-119 testing, or
4.01.2 The CMU has been certified through the equivalent thickness method contained in Chapter 3 of ACI 216.1 or NCMA TEK 7-1A. (These requirements apply to blended and single aggregate CMU's).
4.01.2.1 For fire rated CMU's that are manufactured with blending two or more aggregates under the requirements of 2.01.2, blending percentages must be established by determining the dry-rodded weights of the aggregates rather than the damp-loose weights (as weighed in the batching process).
4.01.2.2 The percentage of each aggregate (dry-rodded weight) will be reported in the concrete masonry submittal.
4.02 The equivalent thickness of each fire rated block will be established by ASTM C-140. Verification of the equivalent thickness of fire rated CMU's will be supplied by an independent testing laboratory and submitted in the concrete masonry submittal.

Concrete Masonry Units Equivalent
Thickness Requirements
For Fire Ratings When Blending Primary Aggregates With Sand As Per ACI 216.1
| 100% Single Aggregate | Minimum Equivalent Thickness (Inches) Required |
| (No Blending) | 4 hr | 3.5 hr | 3hr | 2.5 hr | 2 hr | 1.5 hr | 1hr | 0.5 hr |
| Pumice or Expanded Slag
Expanded Clay, Shale, Slate Limestone or Cinders or Slag Calcareous or Siliceous Gravel |
4.70
5.10 5.90 6.20 |
4.40
4.80 5.50 5.80 |
4.00
4.40 5.00 5.30 |
3.60
4.00 4.50 4.80 |
3.20
3.60 4.00 4.20 |
2.70
3.30 3.40 3.60 |
2.10
2.60 2.70 2.80 |
1.50
1.80 1.90 2.00 |
| 80/20% Blending* | Minimum Equivalent Thickness (Inches) Required |
| Aggregate Plus 20% Sand | 4 hr | 3.5 hr | 3hr | 2.5 hr | 2 hr | 1.5 hr | 1hr | 0.5 hr |
| Pumice or Expanded Slag
Expanded Clay, Shale, Slate Limestone or Cinders or Slag Calcareous or Siliceous Gravel |
5.00
5.32 5.96 6.20 |
4.68
5.00 5.56 5.80 |
4.26
4.58 5.06 5.30 |
3.84
4.16 4.56 4.80 |
3.40
3.72 4.04 4.20 |
2.88
3.36 3.44 3.60 |
2.24
2.64 2.72 2.80 |
1.60
1.84 1.92 2.00 |
| 70/30% Blending* | Minimum Equivalent Thickness (Inches) Required |
| Aggregate Plus 30% Sand | 4 hr | 3.5 hr | 3hr | 2.5 hr | 2 hr | 1.5 hr | 1hr | 0.5 hr |
| Pumice or Expanded Slag
Expanded Clay, Shale, Slate Limestone or Cinders or Slag Calcareous or Siliceous Gravel |
5.15
5.43 5.99 6.20 |
4.82
5.10 5.59 5.80 |
4.39
4.67 5.09 5.30 |
3.96
4.24 4.59 4.80 |
3.50
3.78 4.06 4.20 |
2.97
3.39 3.46 3.60 |
2.31
2.66 2.73 2.80 |
1.65
1.86 1.93 2.00 |
| 60/40% Blending* | Minimum Equivalent Thickness (Inches) Required |
| Aggregate Plus 40% Sand | 4 hr | 3.5 hr | 3hr | 2.5 hr | 2 hr | 1.5 hr | 1hr | 0.5 hr |
| Pumice or Expanded Slag
Expanded Clay, Shale, Slate Limestone or Cinders or Slag Calcareous or Siliceous Gravel |
5.30
5.54 6.02 6.20 |
4.96
5.20 5.62 5.80 |
4.52
4.76 5.12 5.30 |
4.08
4.32 4.62 4.80 |
3.60
3.84 4.08 4.20 |
3.06
3.42 3.48 3.60 |
2.38
2.68 2.74 2.80 |
1.70
1.88 1.94 2.00 |
| 50/50% Blending* | Minimum Equivalent Thickness (Inches) Required |
| Aggregate Plus 50% Sand | 4 hr | 3.5 hr | 3hr | 2.5 hr | 2 hr | 1.5 hr | 1hr | 0.5 hr |
| Pumice or Expanded Slag
Expanded Clay, Shale, Slate Limestone or Cinders or Slag Calcareous or Siliceous Gravel |
5.45
5.65 6.05 6.20 |
5.10
5.30 5.65 5.80 |
4.65
4.85 5.15 5.30 |
4.20
4.40 4.65 4.80 |
3.70
3.90 4.10 4.20 |
3.15
3.45 3.50 3.60 |
2.45
2.70 2.75 2.80 |
1.75
1.90 1.95 2.00 |
| 40/60% Blending* | Minimum Equivalent Thickness (Inches) Required |
| Aggregate Plus 60% Sand | 4 hr | 3.5 hr | 3hr | 2.5 hr | 2 hr | 1.5 hr | 1hr | 0.5 hr |
| Pumice or Expanded Slag
Expanded Clay, Shale, Slate Limestone or Cinders or Slag Calcareous or Siliceous Gravel |
5.60
5.76 6.06 6.20 |
5.24
5.40 5.68 5.80 |
4.78
4.94 5.18 5.30 |
4.32
4.48 4.68 4.80 |
3.80
3.96 4.12 4.20 |
3.24
3.48 3.52 3.60 |
2.52
2.72 2.78 2.80 |
1.80
1.92 1.96 2.00 |
| 30/70% Blending* | Minimum Equivalent Thickness (Inches) Required |
| Aggregate Plus 70% Sand | 4 hr | 3.5 hr | 3hr | 2.5 hr | 2 hr | 1.5 hr | 1hr | 0.5 hr |
| Pumice or Expanded Slag
Expanded Clay, Shale, Slate Limestone or Cinders or Slag Calcareous or Siliceous Gravel |
5.75
5.87 6.11 6.20 |
5.38
5.50 5.71 5.80 |
4.91
5.03 5.21 5.30 |
4.44
4.56 4.71 4.80 |
3.90
4.02 4.14 4.20 |
3.33
3.51 3.54 3.60 |
2.59
2.74 2.77 2.80 |
1.85
1.94 1.97 2.00 |
| 20/80% Blending* | Minimum Equivalent Thickness (Inches) Required |
| Aggregate Plus 80% Sand | 4 hr | 3.5 hr | 3hr | 2.5 hr | 2 hr | 1.5 hr | 1hr | 0.5 hr |
| Pumice or Expanded Slag
Expanded Clay, Shale, Slate Limestone or Cinders or Slag Calcareous or Siliceous Gravel |
5.90
5.98 6.14 6.20 |
5.52
5.60 5.74 5.80 |
5.04
5.12 5.21 5.30 |
4.56
4.64 4.74 4.80 |
4.00
4.08 4.16 4.20 |
3.42
3.54 3.56 3.60 |
2.66
2.76 2.78 2.80 |
1.90
1.96 1.98 2.00 |
Determining The Fire Resistance Of
Concrete Masonry Assemblies
FIRE RESISTANCE RATINGS
The fire resistance rating of concrete masonry elements can be determined by two methods:
ASTM E-119 tests full walls under fire conditions. It is an expensive procedure that is generally used as a research tool rather than a compliance test. Because of the vast number of ASTM E-119 testing programs using a variety of aggregates, there is sufficient data available to support an accurate calculation method for determining the fire resistance ratings of concrete masonry wall systems.
CALCULATING FIRE RESISTANCE
Extensive testing has established a relationship between fire resistance and the physical properties of concrete masonry units. This relationship provides the basis for calculating fire ratings based on the equivalent thickness of the masonry unit and the types of aggregates used in the production of the unit. This calculation can even be made when the different aggregates are blended together.
What equivalent thickness would be needed for an 8"x8"x16" block manufactured using Witelite pumice (50% by volume) and siliceous sand (50% by volume) to meet a tow hour fire-resistive rating?
Equivalent thickness of Witelite (2 hr) = 3.2 in.
Equivalent thickness of sand (2 hr) = 4.2 in.
Then: (3.2 x 0.50) + (4.2 x 0.50) = 3.7 in
Calculations show that a 3.7 inch equivalent thickness would be needed to provide a two-hour rated block made using 50% Witelite pumice and 50% sand measured by volume.NOTE:
Underwriter Laboratories tested a 50% Witelite pumice and sand blend 8 inch unit on July 17, 1998 using the E-119 test method. The test verified that it exceeded a two hour fire rating. Testing a total of six different walls with different blending ratios ratified the calculation method of determining fire ratings.
The equivalent thickness of a concrete masonry unit is determined through testing using ASTM C-140, Standard Methods of Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units. For example, not all 8"x8"x16" concrete blocks have the same equivalent thickness. The equivalent thickness may vary depending on the core configuration, web thickness, and faced-shell thickness. Table 1 shows the equivalent thickness of typical concrete masonry units; however, for fire resistance ratings, it is important to know the precise equivalent thickness of a specified block. The concrete block supplier can be requested to submit test results that will establish the equivalent thickness of any CMU furnished for any job.
| Table 1 - Equivalent Thickness of Typical Concrete Masonry Units (Inches) |
| Nominal
Width (In.) |
Typical Hollow Units | 75%
Solid |
100%
Solid |
| 4
6 8 10 12 |
2.7
3.1 3.9 5.0 5.5 |
2.7
4.2 5.7 7.2 8.7 |
3.6
5.6 7.6 9.6 11.6 |
SOLID GROUTED CONSTRUCTION
The equivalent thickness of concrete masonry units which are solidly grouted will be considered the same as the actual measured width of the unit.
FILLING CELLS WITH LOOSE FILL MATERIAL
If the cells of hollow unit masonry are filled with approved materials, the equivalent thickness of the assembly can be considered the same as the actual thickness. Approved loose materials will be dry sand, pea gravel, crushed stone, pumice, scoria, expanded shale, clay, or slate, expanded flyash, perlite, and vermiculite.
REFERENCES:
NCMA TEK 7-1, ACI 216.1, ASTM E-119
Calculating Mix Designs For Fire
Rated Concrete Masonry Units
Using the calculation method for determining the fire resistance of concrete masonry units requires three things: (1) the exact equivalent thickness of the unit, (2) the type of aggregate(s) being used, and (3) the dry-rodded weight of the aggregate(s). Concrete masonry unit producers generally do not perform daily tests to determine the dry-rodded weight of the aggregates being used. Even weekly testing will not predict the amount of moisture present on the day the materials are being used. Dry spells and rain will affect the moisture daily. That being the case, estimating the moisture content of aggregates can be an acceptable practice only if the estimates are conservative.
Lightweight aggregates will generally hold more moisture than normal weight
aggregates. A 20% moisture content is common if the lightweight aggregate is
exposed to continued wet weather. This guide allows the block producer to assume
the worst-case moisture content of aggregates based on conservative and safe
aggregate blending ratios.
MIX DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS
1. Witelite aggregate - assume 54 pcf dry-rodded weight and 20% moisture content.
2. All limestone aggregates - assume 101 pcf dry-rodded weight and 12% moisture content.
3. All calcareous and siliceous aggregates - assume 103 pcf dry-rodded weight and 4% moisture content.
EXAMPLE OF CALCULATIONS
(Example: 50% Witelite and 50% sand CMU for a two hour fire rated block)
Cement - 750 lbs.
Witelite - 2,500 lbs. (w/moisture), moisture content - 20%
Sand - 4,100 lbs. (w/moisture), moisture content - 4%
To calculate dry weight of Witelite: 2,500 ÷÷÷÷ 1.20 = 2,080 lbs. dry-rodded weight
To calculate dry weight of sand: 4,100 ÷÷÷ 1.04 = 3,940 lbs. dry-rodded weight
Dry-rodded weight of Witelite - use 54 pcf
Dry-rodded weight of sand - use 103 pcf
Aggregate to Cement Ratio (Individual Aggregates)
750 lbs. cement ÷÷÷ 94 pcf = 7.98 cu. ft.
2,080 lbs. Witelite ÷÷ ÷ 54 pcf = 38.58 cu. ft.
4,100 lbs. sand ÷÷ ÷÷ 103 pcf= 38.27 cu. ft.
Ratio = 38.58 cu. ft. (Witelite) ÷ 7.98 cu. ft. cement = 4.84
38.27 cu. ft. (sand) ÷÷÷ ÷÷ 7.98 cu. ft. cement = 4.80
Proportions = 1: (4.84 + 4.80) = 9.63 4.84 ÷÷÷ ÷ 9.63 = 50.26% 4.80 ÷÷÷ ÷÷ 9.63 = 49.84%
Percentage of Aggregate (based on cu. ft. - dry-rodded weight)
Witelite - 50.26% (50%)
Sand - 49.84% (50%)
MIX DESIGN AS WEIGHED IN THE SCALE HOPPER
Witelite - 2,500 lbs.
Sand - 4,100 lbs.
Cement - 750 lbs.
Totals - 7,350 lbs.
PLANT MANAGERS WORKSHEET
This calculation can be performed automatically using a lotus or excel worksheet. Please refer to the front of this binder for the disk.
BASIC ASSUMPTIONS
Witelite maximum moisture - 20%
Sand maximum moisture - 4%
Limestone maximum moisture - 12%
Granite screens, gravel moisture - 4%
Dry-rodded weight of Witelite - 54 pcf
Dry-rodded weight of Sand - 103 pcf
Dry-rodded weight of Limestone - 101 pcf
Dry-rodded weight of Gran./Gravel - 106 pcf
SUGGESTED STARTING POINTS FOR CALCULATIONS
(Witelite And Sand)
50% Witelite - 50% Sand blend
Witelite - 2,500 lbs. (with moisture)
Sand - 4,100 lbs. (with moisture)
Cement - 750 lbs.
70% Witelite - 30% Sand blendWitelite - 2,500 lbs. (with moisture)
Sand - 1,800 lbs. (with moisture)
Cement - 700 lbs.
60% Witelite - 40% Sand blend
Witelite - 2,500 lbs. (with moisture)
Sand - 2,700 lbs. (with moisture)
Cement - 750 lbs.
80% Witelite - 20% Sand blend
Witelite - 2,500 lbs. (with moisture)
Sand - 1,050 lbs. (with moisture)
Cement - 650 lbs.
CALCULATION PROCEDURE
To calculate dry weight of Witelite: lbs. ÷÷÷ 1.20 = lbs. dry
To calculate dry weight of Sand: lbs. ÷÷÷ 1.04 = lbs. dry
To calculate dry weight of Limestone: lbs. ÷÷÷ 1.12 = lbs. dry
To calculate dry weight of Granite
screens, gravel: lbs. ÷÷÷ 1.04 = lbs. dry
AGGREGATE TO CEMENT RATIO
(Individual Aggregates)
lbs. Cement ÷ 94 pcf = cf
lbs. Witelite ÷ 54 pcf = cf
lbs. Sand ÷ 103 pcf = cf
lbs. Limestone ÷ 104 pcf = cf
lbs. Gran./Gravel ÷ 106 pcf = cf
RATIOS
cf Witelite ÷ cf cement = a.
cf Sand ÷ cf cement = b.
cf Limestone ÷ cf cement = c.
cf Gran./Gravel ÷ cf cement = d.
PROPORTIONS
(a. + b. + c. + d. ) = t. (total)
a. ÷ t= %,
b. ÷ t= %,
c. ÷ t= %,
d. ÷ t= %.
PERCENTAGE OF AGGREGATE
(Based On Cu. Ft.)
EQUIVALENT THICKNESS CALCULATIONS
(For A Two Hour Rating)
Witelite 3.2 x (% of total agg.) = in
Sand 4.2 x (% of total agg.) = in
Limestone 4.0 x (% of total agg.) = in
Gran./Gravel 4.2 x (% of total agg.) = in
Total Equivalent Thickness Rating = in
MIX DESIGN AS WEIGHED IN HOPPER
(With Moisture)
Witelite ÷ lbs.
Sand ÷ lbs.
Limestone ÷ lbs.
Gran./Gravel ÷ lbs.
Cement ÷ lbs.
lbs. total batch
1998 Underwriters Laboratories ASTM E-119 Fire Tests
Tarmac America, Inc. July 13-17, 1998
| Block Tested | Percent Aggregate Blend | Equivalent Thickness (Inches) | Percent Solid | Target Duration Of Test | Maximum Average Temperature To Pass | Maximum Single Point Temperature To Pass | Actual Average Time/Temp. | Actual Single Point Time/Temp. |
| 6x8x16
8x8x16 8x8x16 8x8x16 8x8x16 |
70% Pumice
30% Sand 60% Pumice 40% Sand 60% Pumice 40% Sand 60% Pumice 40% Sand 50% Pumice 50% Sand |
4.6
3.8 4.93 5.9 3.8 |
82%
50% 65% 77% 50% |
3 hr.
(180 min.) 2 hr. (120 min.) 3 hr. (180min.) 4 hr. (240 min.) 2 hr. (120 min.) |
Ambient + 250 D
334 Degrees Ambient + 250 D 330 Degrees Ambient + 250 D 332 Degrees Ambient + 250 D 332 Degrees Ambient + 250 D 333 Degrees |
Ambient + 325 D
409 Degrees Ambient + 325 D 405 Degrees Ambient + 325 D 407 Degrees Ambient + 325 D 407 Degrees Ambient + 250 D 408 Degrees |
3 hr. 28 min.
334 Degrees 2 hr. 21 min. 330 Degrees 2 hr. 15 min. 332 Degrees 4 hr. 30 min. 272 Degrees 2 hr. 7 min. 333 Degrees |
3 hr. 46 min.
409 Degrees 2 hr. 25 min. 405 Degrees 3 hr. 30 min. 407 Degrees 4 hr. 30 min. 299 Degrees 2 hr. 6 min. 408 Degrees |
| 8x8x16 | 100% Pumice | 3.8 | 50% | 2 hr.
(120 min.) |
Ambient + 250 D
330 Degrees |
Ambient + 325 D
405 Degrees |
2 hr. 52 min.
330 Degrees |
2 hr. 50 min.
405 Degrees |